JULIEN MASNADA
JULIEN MASNADA
Oups, seems that the second issue (#230) get pulled as well. The idea was to be able to split each issue in its own pull request.
**Sorry for the confusion, but everything related to #230 should not be pulled.**
pre-commit.ci autofix
BTW, this whole PR might be simply solved by making sure that the AllowUsers contains not only `vagrant` and `ubuntu`, but also `{{ansible_user}}`
Hi @georgenalen , Thanks for your reply. The idea behind the PR was to be able to override just one part of the `ubtu22cis_sshd` structure (in this case the `allow_users`...
Hello @uk-bolly, Thanks for your feedback. I fixed both problems. Please let me know if there is anything missing. Regards
Hello @uk-bolly Sorry to bother you about that, but now I'm confused on how to proceed. Allow me to give you a summary of the situation. As you mentioned the...
@uk-bolly @joshavant sorry for the late answer. Just a quick question to check that I understood properly what you are requesting. You want the merge commit (aa21b5b38bc13da89e0d88941e6df2f8250163c9) to also be...
@joshavant unless I'm mistaken the commit is a merge commit from the Github Merge UI process, and therefore signed by Github's own key. Please do correct me if I'm mistaken...