Andreas Rossberg
Andreas Rossberg
> * imports.wast has it commented out That's because JS originally couldn't handle it. We should be able to activate these tests nowadays. > * "spectest" in sync_index.js/async_index.js doesn't have...
Yeah, that would be great, since I don't really know or use that code and it looks like @bnjbvr is no longer around.
@lars-t-hansen, is that more than just a theoretic possibility? The producer would need to know precisely what wasm2c spits out, which it probably cannot even rely on being the same...
Upgrading the branch seems plausible, but we'd need to make sure that there are no other clients of the 1.0 test suite that we'd break with that.
Seamless module merges would be a great property. Technically, the issues with memories and tables ought to be solved soon with the proposals for multi-memories and for reference types, respectively....
@fabiosantoscode: > * You can inline a function into a data: URL That's a bug, not a feature. Unless you *want* to help attackers.
See #311 for implementation and tests.
@manoskouk, I believe that wouldn't be forward-compatible. For example, if we later introduce type imports `$t
I'm all for adding `struct`, even in the MVP, to avoid an odd asymmetry. But I didn't want to mix it up with this PR.
> Aren't we doing the same thing for `func` right now? `(ref.null func)` is typed `(ref null func)` in the MVP. Only if you are assuming that we are removing...