Roman Lutz

I tried this and it *almost* works, except that the literalinclude output starts with ``` .. code-block:: none ``` We couldn't put it after the code-block starts, could we?

Okay, nevermind, one can do literalinclude starting from line 2 ``` Out: .. literalinclude:: ../auto_examples/plot_myscript.rst :start-after: .. sphx-glr-output-block-008-start :end-before: .. sphx-glr-output-block-008-end :lines: 2- ``` The numbering of blocks doesn't start...

@lucyleeow definitely, please go ahead! I won't get to it anytime soon I'm afraid. Thank you!

> We could ignore html output or add the comments around all output? How would we be able to add comments around all the output? If it's somehow possible (without...

I believe I'm hitting the same issue with dataset 42192. I managed to delete the associated run, but the task is not owned by me (likely because of creation in...

I can't reproduce this with the current version of `ErrorAnalysisDashboard`. Perhaps when you filed this we didn't create separate objects and reused the same port, @nushib ? If you can...

Just to confirm: You want support for multiple sensitive features, right?

@kicha0 you're mentioning a breaking change in the description. What's the breaking change?

@imatiach-msft this recent thread may be related https://community.databricks.com/s/question/0D53f00001RYmgJCAT/hosting-python-application-on-azure-databricks-and-exposing-its-rest-apis Just wanted to share since the older link doesn't work anymore. What do you users have to do to see the static...

Yes, that's the default. Does it not render for you?