Roman Ivanov
Roman Ivanov
Still red. Please consider annotation usage
@Rohanraj123 , ping
Solution should be https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15133#issuecomment-2205259416 This PR look abandoned and going in wrong direction
Yes, more documentation is always good. But nobody wants to maintain it, keep up to date and even provide. We have already very draconic rules on quality and pendantic details....
You can probably can describe exact problem with exact situation with exact check to let me understand
>Are you saying that I can activate all checks and the Checkstyle engine will determine if I'm eligible to use it depending on the JDK I use to launch it...
I don't think there are a lot more Checks like this. If that is not majority, doing table for all does not make sense. We can simply add note to...
@Maze-fr, ping
>We should also cover these cases: Such cases are part of multi block, there should be some content in `{}`. So violations valid.
@rdiachenko , https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/a26873aee09926ac6e584af67dd9ba8cd069fdc9/src/main/resources/google_checks.xml#L125-L133 this is how we already allow `{}` for methods and any other strucutures. May be we should just extend this list of properties or make some more...