Roman Ivanov

@rnveach , @nrmancuso , please review and approve. @tfij, if no response will be there before 1 january 2023, please mention me here, I will approve issue.

almost whole work is done at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/10804, just need new property introduction.

will be handled at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/13672

>I've also completed my StrictEmptyLineSeparatorCheck If you want this Check be accessible to others, you can contribute it to https://github.com/sevntu-checkstyle/sevntu.checkstyle , we use this project as sandbox for Check to...

@peterdemaeyer , what do you think on proposal at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/5439#issuecomment-1097041065 I think it will cover what you need and also it will be more customizable for special team preferences.

if we ever endup in refactoring of this, we need to test by chapter from guideline. if we map chapter requirements to set of modules, we need to load them...

I approved issue, but there might be nuances as some wording is not clear for me. But yes, Xpath is regular single module test, old style. ITs are multi-module tests...

yes, please takes , there is almost done PR, please reuse that code. That PR is abandoned.

Add execution of `validations.cmd git-diff` after https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/08814f209de43368cf9078a56e9175bf1f91f7a9/appveyor.yml#L75 and create a PR. We will suggest in PR how to trigger a gift. Most easy way to cause a diff is to...

@kalpadiptyaroy, thanks a lot for your hard work on this not easy issue. All windows contributors should know that you are hero who makes their lives easier. I look forward...