roll
roll
Thanks to @peterdesmet huge effort the CSVW comparison has been just published - https://datapackage.org/guides/csvw-data-package/ :tada:
Definitely! Actually, it just needs to be properly articulated but technically JSON Data Resource is already supported by core Data Resource spec so there is no need in the recipe...
Hi @khughitt @pschumm @salmathalji, This is the issue I mentioned in our community call last week regarding hybrid (tabular/non-tabular) data validation. I think we have here quite a low-hanging fruit...
I think it's a separate feature request on the validation level while #709 is about data interoperability issue
DUPLICATE to https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/641
@pwalsh Amazing to see you joining! I added you to the WG team
@akariv Amazing! Added you to the team
Hi @nichtich, Would you like to join the Working Group?
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group Today's update is tiny as we didn't manage to start working on the specs issues in December but we will in January. So the only news is that...
Dear @frictionlessdata/data-package-working-group, Here is the first update of the new version of the standard work. Please take your time voting and reviewing the proposals as it's meant to be at...