roll
Hi @shashigharti can you please take a look?
Hi @joaomg, So yes if you prefer to go with a separate plugin (which will be easier to work on and maintain at least for a starter) feel free to...
@awm33 Hi. Great! Let me prepare in coming days some ideas for how it could be added to the library. So you'll be able to contribute.
@awm33 Sorry for the late response I've been on holidays. I'd like to ask for ideas here from @akariv and @amercader. Adam was working pretty closely on usage of `jsontableschem-sql-py`...
@niconoe Please take a look at my review - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/FrictionlessDarwinCore/issues/7. For FrictionlessData software we have already sorted out all these non-functional problems like how to store the version etc (see...
Hi @cschloer, would you like to PR?
@cschloer Let's discuss on Monday what's the best place we can put it in (PR to dataflows/custom/etc)
Is it recognizable enough as a `pipeline(s)`? Because it's just kinda a common word. Maybe `data-pipeline(s)`
But `pipeline` is an established concept in programming
Name for plugins are superlong (cc @brew). I was against `pipelines` because it's not specific enough in my mind. But it there other one word alternatives? `datapipe(s)`? PS. E.g. `datapackage-pipelines-sourcespec-registry`