roll
Thanks a lot @pschumm! I hope this PR https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/pull/844 closes this issue :tada:
Hi, I've created a feature request for the framework to pilot the feature: - https://github.com/frictionlessdata/framework/issues/1434
@peterdesmet Peter, I totally agree. Since Tabular Data Resource introduction, Tabular Data Package basically lost all the added value it had as initially it had been created to guarantee resource...
Thanks, link has been removed for now
Hi @datagistips, Sorry, this issue somehow hadn't been answered =( It's very interesting I think it will be great to start from a pattern - https://datapackage.org/standard/patterns/
FIXED in https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/645
Thanks a lot for the analysis! Usually, new concepts are added to the Standard as a pattern, for example, https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/pull/844. Would you be interested in working on one?
Hi @loco-philippe, > Do I prepare a first version that I share with a PR (and we then exchange/complete it) ? Yes :rocket: v1 website supports Mermaid - https://specs.frictionlessdata.io/, but...
DONE https://datapackage.org/recipes/relationship-between-fields/ Thanks a lot @loco-philippe !
Thanks, @nichtich! I think it should not be a blocker as in specs like this we have a privilege to start from a small core and extend once other properties...