Thomas Höhenleitner comments

Results 196 comments of


                                            Thomas Höhenleitner

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

There is no protection against overflow. If you produce in the average more data than transmittable or have a data burst, which exceeds the provided buffer size, you will end...

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

The ring buffer overflow does not mean, that other memory regions are destroyed. Inside the ring buffer older messages not transmitted yet, are overwritten. This could lead to incomplete messages...

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

Please have a look at issue #294. Could that be the reason? What is the buffer size and what does the max depth value say? How many date bytes you...

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

I like that you do such harsh tests. Maybe the trice tool `-s` CLI switch can help a bit. There is also a `-debug` switch for the trice tool.

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

Just to explain this for now: ```c TriceBufferWritePosition = (TriceBufferWritePosition + (TRICE_BUFFER_SIZE>>2))

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

Unfortunately I have no time right now for looking deeper and tomorrow I am mostly offline. The problem you found could be a part of the TCOBS code. So one...

Using TRICE_RING_BUFFER still crashes if "Tricing a lot"

Could it be, that you mixed `TRICE_DEFERRED_BUFFER_SIZE` with `TRICE_BUFFER_SIZE` in your investigations? I would do it like this: Change ```C uint32_t TriceRingBuffer[TRICE_DEFERRED_BUFFER_SIZE>>2] ; ``` into ```C uint32_t TriceRingBuffer[(TRICE_DEFERRED_BUFFER_SIZE>>2)+4] ; ```...