Robert

> Maybe, but in the context of loading an SBOM, generating data that is not present in the SBOM may not always be wanted. So kind of data integrity with...

@tdruez Works like a charm.

@pombredanne that is what I suspected. From an outside perspective it would make sense to me if this feature would be in ScanCode.io, given that we already analyze the SBOM...

@DennisClark We are currently having trouble with putting DejaCode in production use, because the resolving of PURLs does not seem to happen for package created through an SBOM import unlike...

@tdruez If I'm not mistaken this is partially the underlying issue in https://github.com/aboutcode-org/dejacode/issues/258 as well, although purl2url would not resolve this as it currently does not support Maven packages (https://github.com/package-url/packageurl-python/issues/179)....

- Do you have a rough timeframe until when you plan to complete this? - Is my understanding correct, that once this is implemented, the foundation is laid for modelling...

That is fantastic news! Thank you for all the hard work you put into your software. I'm looking forward to testing the new features as soon as they are available.

@tdruez Thank you for the quick reply. "Update packages automatically from scan" is enabled, but I will double check my test cases just to be sure and report back.

It seems that there is an error with the webhooks. Checking on project scans that ran successful in ScanCode.io show the following error:  ``` No connection adapters were found...

@tdruez Thank you for your help! Setting the `SITE_URL` unfortunately did not fully resolve it. It looks like ScanCode's webhook runs without errors now, but DejaCode still does not assign...