Roger Peppe

I don't think it has been mentioned in this issue before, but it should have been: the current wording of the spec [supports](https://cuelang.org/docs/references/spec/#logical-operators) short-circuiting logical operators AFAICS: > The right...

> At the API level we can still make different choices FWIW this proposal _is_ entirely about changing the API-level semantics, not the CUE spec itself, which would be considerably...

> `concrete()` would further require that the value of its argument be fully concrete, and return a recursively closed value. FWIW I would not define it to return a recursively...