rodolforg
rodolforg
I tested on Linux here and looked at console output: master branch, AppImage 1.5.0/1.4.2/1.4.1, Debian 1.4.0, AppImage 1.2.1-testing-17.09.09 ... All of them output this when I follow the steps mentioned...
I investigated it a bit - I did not advanced to a solution, but it also happens with Bone selection too (in bone parent selection) o.O
I "found" the problem: somewhere after an "activate" signal, a gtk closure tries to set the combobox active item with an invalid iter. If we comment out this line: https://github.com/synfig/synfig/blob/65303bc518cef3381bb537b0e29d61d1f3849e31/synfig-studio/src/gui/widgets/widget_value.cpp#L133...
OK. I saw that `signal_value_node_replaced()` is called (almost) right after `signal_value_node_changed()` is called. This somehow causes the crash. The action `ValueNodeReplace` calls `ValueNode::replace()` that indirectly calls the signal `changed`. Then...
This issue is already fixed in v1.4.1.
@ice0 does the issue exist on master branch?
Hi! > As long as it's possible and wanted, I'm planning on implementing this myself. Yes, it's possible to do it and, for the two upvotes you already got, it's...
> Any ideas on better ways to do this, or is there already a way? Forgot to answer it: you can do it like you suggested or placing an extra...
> I can't promise that I can put many hours into it, but I can help edit and proofread english docs if you want. Oh, I only showed it to...
> Another issue that must be sorted is when you create a point (vertex) with zero tangent radius, and then later if you want to bring out those tangent handles,...