rig-monitor
rig-monitor copied to clipboard
rodneymo
consistent metrics mapping to influx miner_system and miner_gpu fields
Metrics can have different meanings across different miners. Harmonizing them into a common influx schema has the benefit of allowing dashboards to be reused.
I have captured the mapping for sgminer and claymore here. @wishbone1138 , could you take a look?
Specific to claymore I don't understand the different between rejected and incorrect. I have never seen a rejected share, only incorrect shares (due to excessive GPU OC). Also claymore doesn't seem to capture stale shares, which sgminer does
I have updated the miner scripts to reflect this filed consistency. Apparently in claymore both rejected and incorrect are invalid licenses. The former is rejected by the pool whereas the latter is detected by the miner.
Gotcha! I always wondered what those two meant, since claymore seems to report a lot more of that than other miners. I noticed you closed this, so I'm assuming we don't still need to discuss it.
I am planning to do the same for the pool scripts. Could you take a look at the wiki and check if I have missed something?
BTW, we still need to add the valid, invalid shares to the nano pool script.
Nanopool does not support invalid share unfortunately.. Unless I'm missing something/ https://eth.nanopool.org/api
I'll try to walk through the wiki soon. I need to match it up to what I'm graphing as well.