Daniel DeGroff

This issue is to support the JSON PATCH specification through our HTTP `PATCH` implementation, if you have particular issues with the PATCH method as it is, you can open issues...

Thanks for that feedback @trevorr that is helpful. It looks like there is a Jackson plugin in support of RFC 7396, this may be helpful. https://github.com/jeffnelson/jackson-merge-patch

I stubbed out a test to prove the algorithm in RFC 7396 using the pseudocode provided. This seems to pass for the test cases they provide. This is just a...

Planning to support both RFC 6902 or RFC 7396 and still preserve backwards compatibility. Setting `Content-Type` will yield: - `application/json` - current behavior which works but is kinda busted for...

Internal doc: - Update `PATCH` doc for APIs to indicate the warning regarding arrays should be limited to using `application/json` and that it is preferred for the caller to utilize...

@mooreds has this been replicated? Assuming if there is a bug here, it is in the client lib and not in FusionAuth.

Possibly related: - https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-jwt/issues/42 No idea if this library will work in Dalvik or Android runtime (ART).

I ended up using https://github.com/java-json-tools/json-patch which has worked pretty well. This library supports both RFC 6902 and 7368. Our usage is pretty straight forward, we just bind a handler based...

Internal - https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-app/pull/148

This seems to work on a current version of Brave. Perhaps no longer an issue. ``` Version 1.43.93 Chromium: 105.0.5195.127 (Official Build) (arm64) (https://brave.com/latest/) ```