Needs evaluation happens before templating is done

[kuzaxak]

As far as I can see after changes from commit were merged our pipeline fail with the next error:

err: release(s) "dev-power/dev-vladimir-kuznichenkov/site-visitor-config-ingress", "dev-power/dev-vladimir-kuznichenkov/overseer-ingress" depend(s) on an undefined release "dev-power/dev-vladimir-kuznichenkov/{{ .Release.Name | trimSuffix \"-ingress\" }}". Perhaps you made a typo in "needs" or forgot defining a release named "{{ .Release.Name | trimSuffix \"-ingress\" }}" with appropriate "namespace" and "kubeContext"?

We are using a template for release:

templates:
  default-release: &default-release
    namespace: 'dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}'

  app-release: &app-release
    <<: *default-release
    missingFileHandler: Debug
    chart: ./application-charts/{{`{{ .Release.Name }}`}}
    labels:
      stage: application
    values:
      - "./values/global.yaml.gotmpl"
      - "./values/{{`{{ .Release.Name }}`}}.yaml"
      - "./values/{{`{{ .Release.Name }}`}}.yaml.gotmpl"

  app-ingress-release: &app-ingress-release
    <<: *app-release
    chart: ../kubernetes/charts/{{`{{ .Release.Name | trimSuffix "-ingress" }}`}}
    needs:
      - dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}/{{`{{ .Release.Name | trimSuffix "-ingress" }}`}}

and release itself:

releases:
  - name: operator-app-launcher
    <<: *app-release
    needs:
      - dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}/sm-domain
      - dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}/backend-web
      - dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}/operator-admin

  - name: operator-app-launcher-ingress
    <<: *app-ingress-release

It seems that function that does the check was executed before templated string from the template was replaced with the actual value.

[nicholascapo]

I see the same error but I was able to reduce it down to a case where there are slashes (/) in the kubeContext (for example when using AWS EKS).

Here is a minimum reproduction:

helmDefaults:
  kubeContext: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/cluster-name # Note '/' in name

repositories:
  - name: stable
    url: https://charts.helm.sh/stable
releases:
  - name: bar
    namespace: namespace
    chart: stable/metrics-server
  - name: foo
    namespace: namespace
    chart: stable/metrics-server
    needs:
      - bar
      # - namespace/bar
      # - cluster-name/namespace/bar
      # - arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/cluster-name/namespace/bar

None of the listed needs actually work as long as there is a / in the context.

$ helmfile template
Adding repo stable https://charts.helm.sh/stable
"stable" has been added to your repositories

in ./helmfile.yaml: release(s) "arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/cluster-name/namespace/foo" depend(s) on an undefined release "cluster-name/namespace/bar". Perhaps you made a typo in "needs" or forgot defining a release named "bar" with appropriate "namespace" and "kubeContext"?

---

Note that if I change the context to add an additional slash:

- kubeContext: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/cluster-name
+ kubeContext: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/clus/ter-name

This is the new error:

$ helmfile template
Adding repo stable https://charts.helm.sh/stable
"stable" has been added to your repositories

in ./helmfile.yaml: release(s) "arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/clus/ter-name/namespace/foo" depend(s) on an undefined release "ter-name/namespace/bar". Perhaps you made a typo in "needs" or forgot defining a release named "bar" with appropriate "namespace" and "kubeContext"?

See specifically undefined release "ter-name/namespace/bar".

[nicholascapo]

Forgot to mention. Removing or replacing the slash means the templates will render:

- kubeContext: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster/cluster-name
+ kubeContext: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:11111111:cluster------cluster-name

[mumoshu]

@nicholascapo Ah okay, yours seems to be a different issue that comes from the fact that helmfile doesn't support / in the context name by design.

I doubt if it ever worked before. What I did in #2026 was about making your case explicitly fail. Before, it won't have failed, but that doesn't mean it worked. The dependency graph might have been silently ignored your releases wen't installed/upgraded in a desired order.

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak Hey. Thanks for reporting.

I need to dig my memory, but I think I completely missed how the use of release template within needs affects the DAG calculation. Did the needs ever affect the order of installation/upgrade in your example? In other words, did it ever work for you before the commit you pointed to?

I doubt not.

[nicholascapo]

Interesting, that is consistent with what we have observed, I don't think it was caused by your commits just made noisy :-)

I wasn't aware of the context name constraint, is that documented somewhere?

[mumoshu]

@nicholascapo No, it isn't documented yet.

[mumoshu]

I don't think it was caused by your commits just made noisy :-)

Let me confirm- so needs did affected the install/upgrade order before, right?

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak Hey. So I reread helmfile's implementation code and it turns out that it never worked.

The expansion of

{{` whatever `}}

in each release is implemented in this function

https://github.com/roboll/helmfile/blob/ae942c5288895c84c79171e5446773e4cb41c4ce/pkg/state/release.go#L10

and it doesn't support needs entries.

So what happened to you is, such needs never worked and it had been silently ignored. The commit https://github.com/roboll/helmfile/commit/9efb7afb4771d60b1a819a495c3f0f725ab33c41 fixed the issue that it is silently ignored, so it fails with a loud error. But that doesn't mean release templates in needs entries are rendered.

A possible solution would be to use go template's {{ define }} and {{ template }} as a alternative to your mix of template and release templates.

[mumoshu]

@nicholascapo Could you create another issue dedicated to additional support for / within kubecontext name when used with needs?

If you could attach a complete helmfile config for reproduction, it would help anyone to contribute.

[kuzaxak]

@nicholascapo Could you create another issue dedicated to additional support for / within kubecontext name when used with needs?

If you could attach a complete helmfile config for reproduction, it would help anyone to contribute.

Will do. Thank you for detailed information!

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak I believe you can keep using this issue if you really want needs to support release templates. Do you? 😃

[kuzaxak]

@kuzaxak I believe you can keep using this issue if you really want needs to support release templates. Do you? 😃

I will try to understand how can we replace them with define and template if won't succeed I will provide the full example and will think about possible solutions.

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak Thanks. FWIW, I was thinking about one like the below example. Note that I have not tested this specific example, and I may have misunderstood your goal. Hope it helps.

{{ define "default" }}
namespace: 'dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}'
missingFileHandler: Debug
labels:
  stage: application
values:
- "./values/global.yaml.gotmpl"
- "./values/{{ $releaseName }}.yaml"
- "./values/{{ $releaseName }}.yaml.gotmpl"
{{ end }}

{{ define "app" }}
{{ $releaseName := . }}
{{ template "default" . }}
chart: ./application-charts/{{ $releaseName }}
{{ end }}

{{ define "ingress" }}
{{ $releaseName := . }}
{{ template "default" . }}
chart: ../kubernetes/charts/{{ $releaseName | trimSuffix "-ingress" }}
needs:
- dev-{{ requiredEnv "NS_NAME" }}/{{ $releaseName | trimSuffix "-ingress" }}
{{ end }}

releases:
- {{ template "app" "app1" | nindent 2 }}
- {{ template "ingress" "app1-ingress" | nindent 2 }}
- {{ template "app" "app2" | nindent 2 }}
- {{ template "ingress" "app2-ingress" | nindent 2 }}

[yurrriq]

We also need needs evaluation to happen after templating. Hopefully the following illustrates our use case.

helmfile.d/00.yaml

releases:
{{ $bar := "bar" }}
- name: {{ $bar }}
  namespace: foo

helmfile.d/01.yaml

releases:
- name: baz
  namespace: quux
  needs:
  - foo/bar

[mumoshu]

@yurrriq needs evaluation does happen after templating. Even @kuzaxak's original issue turned out to be not working due to that helmfile doesn't support release templates in needs entries. It does work with helmfile templates. Perhaps your issue is coming from somewhere else?

[yurrriq]

Interesting. Thanks, @mumoshu. I'll have to investigate further. I also want to solve #1900 whenever I get the chance, so I definitely have some digging to do :smiley: In the meantime I've commented out needs in our state files, which isn't much of an issue for us, thankfully.

[Cayan]

I'm also having some issues with needs, my error related to the kubecontext is a bit different, it doesn't show the content before the initial slash.

in ./helmfile.yaml: in .helmfiles[6]: in releases/istio/helmfile.yaml.gotmpl: release(s) "istio-system/istio-base" depend(s) on an undefined release "stage/default/namespace". Perhaps you made a typo in "needs" or forgot defining a release named "namespace" with appropriate "namespace" and "kubeContext"?

when my context is: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:111111111000:cluster/stage

[mumoshu]

@Cayan Hey. Yours seems to be exactly the same as https://github.com/roboll/helmfile/issues/2048#issuecomment-1013513979, which is another issue unrelated to the one explained in this thread :)

[kuzaxak]

Investigated a bit deeply and found interesting case.

If release has a needs dependency template with selector will always fail.

"/path/to/helmfile.yaml": `
releases:
- name: bar
  chart: stable/mychart2
  namespace: application 
- name: foo
  chart: stable/mychart1
  needs:
  - application/bar
`,
},
selectors: []string{"name=foo"},

Happening because pkg/state/state_run.go:174 filter out only one release, then pkg/app/app.go:1848 replace list of releases to filtered (only one) and then pkg/app/app.go:1860 will fail because it tries to find dependency one more time.

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak Thanks for your help 🙏 Let me confirm- does it fail even with --include-needs?

[kuzaxak]

@kuzaxak Thanks for your help 🙏 Let me confirm- does it fail even with --include-needs?

Will check and prepare PR. We are working on adding go getter to the values and looks like we need to fix both.

[mumoshu]

@kuzaxak Thanks! Really looking forward to seeing your PRs. Oh, and let me note that the helmfile repo has been moved to a new location. You can see https://github.com/roboll/helmfile/issues/1824 for more information about that.

[Morriz]

Hi @mumoshu would you be so kind to review @kuzaxak's PR? If that solves the issue of needs not working in second phase rendering, than we would be very happy! We just update our code stack to use them, as they seemed to work, but probably only because we were in dev mode and deps were installed beforehand. Running a fresh install with needs does not work at all, since we have most definitions only ready after phase 1.

[mumoshu]

@Morriz Hey! Which PR, to be sure? I think this turned out to be issues in some hemlfile sub-commands that they didn't correctly support --include-needs and --skip-needs. I don't know how "phases" you mentioned are implemented in your case, but in case you need to force helmfile to skip certain dependencies, you need to instruct helmfile to do so by specifying --skip-needs. Otherwise Helmfile can't distinguish if you had a wrong dep in helmfile.yaml vs you do have defined correct deps in helmfile.yaml but you need to force skip it for a reason(like you need to deploy only a subset of releases by labels, but deps.

And I thought we already fixed that in https://github.com/helmfile/helmfile/pull/78 as a part of v0.145.0 https://github.com/helmfile/helmfile/releases/tag/v0.145.0

[Morriz]

Thanks for the quick reply. I hoped to find that v0.145.0 release would work for us, but it seems not. At least not for how we need it. We have this helmfile and expect the releases to be installed in order, so each will wait for its deps to be installed. The gatekeeper release installs crds, and gatekeeper-artifacts creates crds based on those, so it is imperative that each install finishes before the next:

bases:
  - snippets/defaults.yaml
---
bases:
  - snippets/env.gotmpl
---
bases:
  - snippets/derived.gotmpl
---
{{ readFile "snippets/templates.gotmpl" }}
{{- $v := .Values }}
{{- $a := $v.apps }}

releases:
  - name: gatekeeper
    installed: {{ $a | get "gatekeeper.enabled" }}
    namespace: gatekeeper-system
    chart: ../charts/gatekeeper
    disableValidationOnInstall: true
    labels:
      pkg: gatekeeper
    values: ...
  - name: gatekeeper-artifacts
    installed: {{ $a | get "gatekeeper.enabled" }}
    needs: [gatekeeper]
    namespace: gatekeeper-system
    chart: ../charts/gatekeeper-artifacts
    labels:
      pkg: gatekeeper
    values: ...
  - name: gatekeeper-constraints
    installed: {{ $a | get "gatekeeper.enabled" }}
    needs: [gatekeeper-artifacts]
    namespace: gatekeeper-system
    chart: ../charts/gatekeeper-constraints
    labels:
      pkg: gatekeeper
    values: ...

Jobs exist in each release that wait for the existence of those, but we never see anything being installed. This makes me wonder if it tries to aggregate all manifests at runtime, which would be strange, as that use case is already solved by helms dependencies resolution.

[mumoshu]

I thought needs was born due to the desire to avoid Helm umbreall chart / helm chart dependencies or some user demand to introduce kustomize configs and raw k8s manifests to the depepdench graph :) Well, anyway, it doesn't alter the meaning of prepare hook. prepare hooks are called while Helmfile validating and preparing all the releases' charts even before calculating the dependency graph. Assuming you're trying to something similar to terraform, you might better use presync although I have not tried that with your use-case in mind. I also remember someone is currently trying to contribute preappy which might be useful to you as it's more versatile than presync.

[Morriz]

I will strip everything related to post/pre as that is not what I wanted to illustrate (I just copy/pasted the code from otomi right now). I just hope you can shed clarification on wether the installs are made one after the other.

[Morriz]

How can we make sure that chart A is installed (until the last helm post-install hook has finished) before chart B ?

[kuzaxak]

I don't think it is possible right now. We faced the same issue and I didn't had time to investigate it or fix it.

We are using installedTemplate to control installation order via sequence of apply jobs.

[mumoshu]

until the last helm post-install hook has finished

I thought it was a helm limitation that helm can't wait on post-install to finish