rf-detr
rf-detr copied to clipboard
The actual test speed of rf-detr is particularly slow
Search before asking
- [x] I have searched the RF-DETR issues and found no similar bug report.
Bug
I conducted a comparative test between rf-deter-nano and yolov6-nano and found that the latter is significantly faster than the former. With an input image size of 672x672, rf-deter-nano takes 2.75ms while yolov6-nano (including NMS processing) only takes 0.45ms. The GPU used is RTX 4080S. Please tell me why there is such a large gap between the two.
Environment
RF-DETR :1.3 Windows 10 Python version:3.11 PyTorch version:2.4 CUDA:11.6 GPU:RTX 4080S
Minimal Reproducible Example
Additional
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
- [ ] Yes, I'd like to help by submitting a PR!
That's because RF-detr nano is supposed to run at 384