Include Eto.Forms in comparison?

[greatawesome]

Would it be worthwhile to include Eto.Forms in your XAML Framework Comparison?

[robloo]

One of the biggest issues is that I have no experience with Eto.Forms. I wasn't even aware it supported a variant of XAML.

However, it also isn't a fully-rendered framework which I generally focus on. Frameworks that forward to native controls on each platforms have a lot of limitations and inconsistencies. I included MAUI because it is Microsoft's framework -- otherwise, I wouldn't give it's architecture much thought and it isn't used internally.

Eto.Forms is probably worth a mention though. However, I won't include it in the comparison tables or the XAML framework evolution chart.

[robloo]

I've mentioned Eto.Forms as well several other UI frameworks not otherwise included in the full comparison. All these definitely deserve a mention.

https://github.com/robloo/PublicDocs/blob/master/XAMLFrameworkComparison.md#xaml-framework-comparison

Closing as complete.