robertj
robertj
I am not sure what you try to do here. can you give some usage examples?
This should be possible with this [PR:"[ WIP, F# 4.2 ] Extension members visible to trait constraints #3582"](https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/pull/3582) which is Release Candidate for 4.2. Let's hope it makes it into...
Yeah the design of this small library could be made even much simpler if the following [language suggestions: "Allow Literals in (Generic) Type Definitions"](https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/608) would get implemented
Will there be multiple `ErasedUnion` s under this proposal? Like `ErasedUnion3`, `ErasedUnion4` etc.?
@kerams everybody seems to agree that type provider are enormously brittle (and that seems to be an understatement still) so having a standard, integrated, lightweight source generation facility would be...
I am a bit lost to imagine how this feature would ever work without some kind of flow analysis
Sorry I have no code here - but I will do some blog posts when this becomes available - comparing the different approaches. I have a deeply nested object graph...
I can not get it to run in pure AS3 (Flexbuilder 4.7) despite the gist you published. It cant find the variable "jasmine".
My proposal would be A) if this is a string enum on the TS side we could assume (heuristically) that the same value constructors with different casings are just there...
Will this allow for generic types coming out of the provider type Bar a = MyTP ?