RFC - Keeping project structure similar to `glamorous`

[atticoos]

In the initial codebase, glamorous-native is set up as 1-1 as possible with glamorous, both in the public and private APIs.

The intention here is to allow efforts by contributors, reviewers, and onlookers from either project to effortlessly navigate through the project, the codebase, and code changes.

As we all have different styles to approaching problems - I would probably set things up a little differently, but I see more value in having a similar codebase.

How do you rate the importance of keeping the implementation under the hood (the private APIs) as close to glamorous as possible?