Roberto Bayardo

@Daniel-K-Ivanov Do you see the same behavior from optimism goerli nodes or does this seem specific to Base? And since the third argument is a fixed block number, wouldn't you...

@sebastianst rebased, can you reopen?

repoened as https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/pull/10941

[deleted - obsolete]

Tim's devnet-3 spec update tracker here: https://notes.ethereum.org/@timbeiko/4844-devnet-3

Yeah would be best if we could align on the same repo to avoid duplicative work but I've been unsuccessful so far trying to converge these work streams. @Inphi what...

FYI this is a client breaking change: we are changing kzg trusted setup to the consensus spec version. https://github.com/mdehoog/go-ethereum/pull/53

BTW we are also moving back to using eip-4844 branches in both prysm & geth for development. I will be deleting the devnet-v3 branches. For eip4844-interop repo we'll be using...

Thanks, will take a look. We set up some default public peers but perhaps they don't have enough capacity. As for the question in the title of this issue, yes...

We do provide a set of nodes available for peering, but apparently not enough. We will look into increasing capacity.