Why not just use the Unlicense?

[Hexstream]

I just read the README, this seems interesting.

This jumped out at me:

Clobber is in the public domain in countries where it is possible to place works in the public domain explicitly. In other countries, we will distribute Clobber according to a license that lets the user do whatever he or she pleases with the code.

Isn't this a solved problem? Why not release this under the Unlicense immediately? I've been using the Unlicense extensively for more than a decade without a problem in sight.

[robert-strandh]

Thanks. That's a good idea.

On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 8:13 AM Jean-Philippe Paradis < @.***> wrote:

I just read the README, this seems interesting.

This jumped out at me:

Clobber is in the public domain in countries where it is possible to place works in the public domain explicitly. In other countries, we will distribute Clobber according to a license that lets the user do whatever he or she pleases with the code.

Isn't this a solved problem? Why not release this under the Unlicense https://unlicense.org/ immediately? I've been using the Unlicense extensively for more than a decade without a problem in sight.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/robert-strandh/Clobber/issues/6, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALBYQL4V33MV2O2ZJOF2H3VEENZFANCNFSM5S6OT3OA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

-- Robert Strandh