Ray Nicholus

I will take another poll during 3.5 development. For now, IE7 lives on. Support WILL be removed in the future at some point though, so start preparing your clients to...

Even after I "remove support" for IE7, I don't intend to start deleting code that will break FU in IE7. At some point, I might do that (to clean up...

I agree with your statement, but, the fact is, I received a big response from IE7 users who also utilize Fine Uploader. By continuing support for IE7, I am prolonging...

I would say you are grossly oversimplifying the work required to develop a good cross-browser uploading tool/library. My guess is you haven't attempted this yet, and you will be quite...

I think I've already addressed your points previously in this thread. Should Fine Uploader support IE6, IE5, Netscape, and Mosaic as well? Certainly we have to draw the line somewhere....

@FastieSystems Currently, one of my big concerns is time, and I have very little of it since I am the only resource on this project, and I am only able...

Noted, and we'll consider this for a future release. Looking at the issue history, [this was mentioned previously by another user](https://github.com/FineUploader/fine-uploader/issues/1222#issuecomment-45005750), but it was in the context of an unrelated...

This has not been a priority as there are at least a couple workarounds. One that comes to mind involves creating your own `` and then [submitting it to Fine...

Not going to be part of 3.9. This would complicate the current convention for non-chunked signature requests. We would need to move the policy document sent in the request body...

Since this is a breaking change, let's wait until we receive specific requests from customers.