Ryan Modrak
Ryan Modrak
before going forward on this, I wonder if anyone might be able to respond to issue #204 ?
Agreed this is a very good issue, I think everyone has hesitated just because of all the backward compatibility issues created by modifications to the weight file
Agreed, the polarity routines have not received as much attention as the others. Now is a good opportunity to improve them.
Agreed, better documenting `taup_model` and similar options could be helpful. While we're looking at it, larger changes such as moving certain calculations between the frontends and backends might also be...
Possibly relevant: https://github.com/mtuqorg/mtuq/issues/309
If there's no further discussion, perhaps we could merge today. Then perhaps we could iterate further in another PR
No problem, let's take up again after next week's presentation... On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM Felix Rodriguez Cardozo < ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > Thanks. Yes....
``` plot_data_greens2(event_id+'DC_waveforms.png', data_bw, data_sw, greens_bw, greens_sw, process_bw, process_sw, misfit_bw, misfit_sw, stations, origin, best_mt, lune_dict, syn_kwargs={'color':'purple'}) ```
Had to resubmit this PR because I made a mistake
Hi Rinku, Thank you for the report. It's possible this is related to the change from GMT to matplotlib-- we will need to investigate