Rachel Mandelbaum

Sorry, I just noticed I did not answer this. The `deep` sample thing is really specific to the 23.5 sample. I would not even allow that kwarg for any random...

@sowmyakth - are you still interested in this? If you have no plans to do this in the near future, then I would like to do it in the coming...

Some more responses and questions: > In my view, the safest approach is to further post-process the images by > convolving them by a PSF a fair bit larger than...

> In the lightcone images, I haven't enforced any stellar mass limit, so the raw images will have no flux > limit, in principle, barring limitations imposed by the simulation...

@gsnyder206 and @ptorrey - This fell off my radar for a while for various reasons, but I am still interested in this and now have a student who may want...

Hi Greg - thanks for the quick reply! I have some questions: > The lightcone images are not yet public, but there is now a set of z > 0...

**Also: I just downloaded one of the light-cone images - very cool!

Thanks for all the information. For the light cone, it depends what dataset we're trying to simulate. For many current surveys, a magnitude limit of r=25 is fine. What is...

> We could steal this file from astropy/specutils and add it to the GalSim repository (which I believe is > allowed by the specutils BSD license), and/or modify it if...

> But in particular, if a galaxy is a sum of bulge + disk, it doesn't (typically) have a single well-defined > SED, so you would want to apply the...