Rémi Louf
Rémi Louf
You are correct, this needs to be fixed.
Thank you for considering contributing. I am not sure why this choice was made at the time, you'd have to ask @saattrupdan
> @rlouf what are your thoughts on replacing `outlines/integrations/transformers.py` with a set of logits processors classes (similar to `outlines/integrations/llamacpp.py`) and updating `examples/transformers_integration.py` accordingly? Yes, this is where I was going...
Of course, any contribution that improves the documentation is greatly appreciated!
@davidberenstein1957 do you need help on this?
Please share and I'll take a look!
Thank you for pointing this out! What do you use for type checking?
This is cool, I really like the `continuous` function to a point I'd consider doing the same thing for `stream`. I'll review the PR soon, please bear with me.
Thank you for opening an issue! Why do you need to remove the `format` property?
We should indeed make sure that this cannot be generated. We might want to skip leap years for now though; according to [this StackOverflow post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15491894/regex-to-validate-date-formats-dd-mm-yyyy-dd-mm-yyyy-dd-mm-yyyy-dd-mmm-yyyy) a regex that takes leap...