Dzmitry Bahdanau
Dzmitry Bahdanau
Maybe you are right, my opinion is not too strong on this matter. It would be nice to have a good student try to make the respective changes and see...
@dwf, in the context of our recent discussion this might sounds interesting to you.
It seems to me that adding this to Blocks and getting read of all parameter getting properties is really simple and uncontroversial, and even does not require any documentation changes.
@dwf , I am confused, `MLP` does not have its own parameters at all, does it?
We definitely assume in many places of Blocks code that parameter names of all bricks are unique. That indeed could be explicitly checked by the `Parameters` object.
But I am pretty sure that in many well-reputed paper the last 10000 examples are used (too lazy to go ahead and check it right now). On 2 February 2016...
At the risk of revealing my ignorance, I will dare to ask: can't we have overlapping splits in Fuel? Can we have "unofficial_train", "unofficial_valid" as additional splits? On 3 February...
I think this will definitely contribute to reproducibility of the research at the lab.. :) Let's make it a CCW ticket? On 4 February 2016 at 10:22, vdumoulin [email protected] wrote:...
The test failure is being investigated in #44.
Hmm, I sort of always assumed that the brick's children are fixed after they brick is created. Do you often modify them in-place?