river
river copied to clipboard
riverwm
wofi rendering error
Actually, the problem is in the title. Tested in other wayland compositors and there is no such problem. I am attaching a screenshot.
Could you provide your wofi configuration? Otherwise there is no way for me to reproduce this.
It's not about configuration. I moved the ~/.config/wofi directory to test. The effect is the same.
Can you then explain what the rendering error is, so someone who does not use wofi and has no idea how the UI is supposed to look can spot it?
In the first shot taken in hyprland, the wofi has a white border on all sides and the in-focus element does not go outside the window. In the second picture, river.
Even visually, you can see that the window in the river is smaller in height.
I also noticed that if you run wofi with the --normal-window option, the window is drawn fine, but accordingly, since it has become a normal floating window, window decorations have appeared.
In both of those screenshots exactly 12 items are visible. I don't see any evidence of a river bug, wofi does seem to have non-deterministic ordering of menu items though.
Just run it with and without the --normal-window option and you'll see the difference.
Both look exactly the same on my end, with the sole difference that once has a border drawn by river, as expected.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52626363/191970491-16135ec2-4ad0-4287-8828-6d2e08c84883.mp4
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52626363/191970557-4db4fc02-b6bb-4b96-b887-55249696c6f1.mp4
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52626363/191972691-a0e872e5-2532-48d6-8f69-c7c905eb1a29.mp4
Ah ok, now I can see it and I definitely can reproduce it. Thanks for the videos.
Ok, so I can only reproduce on the larger of my screens.
Here is the abbreviated WAYLAND_DEBUG output:
[1806177.761] -> [email protected]_size(50, 40)
[1806178.043] [email protected](34540, 50, 40)
[1806178.052] -> [email protected]_configure(34540)
[1806184.753] -> [email protected]_size(1280, 432)
[1806184.794] -> [email protected]()
[1806184.965] [email protected](34542, 1280, 432)
[1806184.974] -> [email protected]_configure(34542)
[1806206.270] -> [email protected](0, 0, 1228, 414)
[1806206.280] -> [email protected]_region(new id wl_region@36)
[1806206.289] -> [email protected](0, 0, 1280, 466)
[1806206.298] -> [email protected]_opaque_region(wl_region@36)
[1806206.313] -> [email protected]_region(new id wl_region@37)
[1806206.321] -> [email protected](-10, -10, 1300, 486)
[1806206.330] -> [email protected]_input_region(wl_region@37)
[1806239.152] [email protected](34543, 1280, 432)
[1806239.162] -> [email protected]_configure(34543)
Their math w.r.t. surface size seems to be a bit messed up? Smells like a client bug to me. Note that rivers layer shell implementation is stricter than that of sway, so it may expose bugs previously unnoticed.