Ritchie Vink

> If you are ok with this design, we can collaborate on the qp_arrow2 branch to finish up the PoC. I don't understand this library enough yet to fully qualify...

Sorry for the delay, I will work on is. Is it ok to also add an implementation based on arrow2 (under a feature flag)?

> @ritchie46 yes, we want to move to arrow2 in the long run as well :) Great! Polars already runs great on arrow2, and this way, I hope to improve...

I got bounced on the arrow2 migration. It was not so trivial to feature gate indeed. So that would probably need a separate branch?

> @ritchie46 I sent my PoC to #465. Wow, you were even able to feature gate it. kudos! :raised_hands:

It isn't really a bug, just a problem with other libs in your environment. If you install the libraries with a different version than anaStruct later (a lower line in...

Have you got some more information? If the anastruct `SystemElements` has no references to any object, it should be removed from memory. Only if you run in Jupyter Notebooks they...

Could you create a minimal working example and clearly define your problem in English?

I really don't think axial forces on supports will be possible in current implementation as both modify the system matrix. When we place this force a bit behind/before the support...

Hi, Looks good. What is the reason of the zero force members in the middle of the bridge? Have you already got an anaStruct model?