rilldata
Cleanup old usage of ListFiles and using the folder name to identify entities
In quite a few place we were still using the old method of using folder name to identify entities. Instead fetching all file names.
This will have the side effect of needing unique file name across all entities. This should be dealt with in a follow up.
Code Review Agent Run Status
- AI Based Review: Successful
Code Review Overview
- Summary: The PR focuses on streamlining entity management by removing deprecated file and folder name-based identification methods across various features, introducing a unified approach for direct file fetching. This significant refactor across Svelte components and TypeScript files aims to simplify the codebase, improve performance, and ensure unique file names for better maintainability and scalability.
- Code change type: Refactoring, Performance Improvement, Security
- Unit tests added: False
- Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3
>>See detailed code suggestions<<
The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 18 files and discovered 6 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
High-level Feedback
The transition to a unified file fetching approach is commendable for its potential to simplify and improve the codebase. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect existing functionalities. Implementing additional security measures and optimizations as suggested in the feedback can further enhance the system's robustness and efficiency. It's also recommended to consider the addition of relevant unit tests to cover the new logic and changes.
I like this cleanup. I'm not sure if this was supposed to address it, but I'm still seeing the name collision error that Andrew reported in Slack. Here's a JAM.
Given it's possible to override the name key within any YAML/SQL file, I'm wondering if we should be fetching existing names via ListResources rather than ListFiles. Thoughts?
Code Review Agent Run Status
- AI Based Review: Successful
Code Review Overview
- Summary: The PR encompasses a broad refactor and optimization of entity management and file artifact handling, focusing on improving performance, security, and code maintainability. It introduces a centralized file artifact management system, enhances name fetching and validation mechanisms to prevent duplicates and unauthorized access, and optimizes file handling for better performance and scalability.
- Code change type: Refactoring, Performance Improvement, Security
- Unit tests added: False
- Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3
>>See detailed code suggestions<<
The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 29 files and discovered 14 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
High-level Feedback
The PR significantly improves the codebase by streamlining entity management and file handling, but it requires careful review to ensure that the new centralized system adequately addresses performance, security, and scalability concerns without introducing new issues. It's recommended to add comprehensive unit tests to cover the new changes, especially around the new file artifact management system and name validation mechanisms, to ensure robustness and prevent potential regressions.