Rikerfi

Results 14 comments of Rikerfi

Hi Pekka and Luiz. we have talked about this topic a few times, but always we get back to the sad fact there is no official standard xunit output. The...

>We could obviously consider making it so that `[Tags]` would override `Test Tags` as well, but I believe that functionality wouldn't be as convenient. Voting `NO` to consider `[Tags]` would...

@pekkaklarck You got me right. I love the original idea to rename `Force Tags` to `Test Tags` and remove `Default Tags`. That would be a step ahead.

Something hassle with WIN environment. I try to fix that by guessing the problem is with Unicode characters. Unfortunately, I don't have WIN device available anytime soon. I need to...

> > > Something hassle with WIN environment. I try to fix that by guessing the problem is with Unicode characters. Unfortunately, I don't have WIN device available anytime soon....

> Ups, for some reason the PR auto closed itself - working on the fix. No worries, I could create new one.

> Great addition! Thanks, @rikerfi ! And sorry for being so nit-picky! wink Hah, no worries. Reviews are the right place for that :smile:

I also got it a bit wrong, that's why deleted my comment. I made a tryout getting: ``` resource.robot:1:1 [E] 0401 Robot Framework syntax error: Resource file with 'Test Cases'...

> I also got it a bit wrong, that's why deleted my comment. I made a tryout getting: > > ``` > resource.robot:1:1 [E] 0401 Robot Framework syntax error: Resource...

It is more like the latter: > OR rather it's about checking if the keyword call uses the same name convention as library definition? This would be check that requires...