Rick Staa

@JMKanmo, there are still some issues with the language algorithm that require attention: 1. Currently, the algorithm only considers the first 100 repositories of a user, as documented in this...

> Hi @rickstaa, I understand your caution in modifying the ranking system, but I believe that making changes is always good. Can some temporary modifications based on existing ranking system...

Just a heads-up. I just merged https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats/pull/1186 which, in my opinion, is a great improvement compared to the old ranking. You are welcome to open pull requests if you think...

Closing this as completed.

Re-opened so that people can provide feedback on the new ranking system and create improvements.

> Would be good to update the readme for this project to include an explanation on the ranking system and meaning of the letters. You're right! The documentation will be...

> So with the new ranking algo, a former ranking of 'S' for 12K plus annualized commits earns a modest ranking of 'B'. My ego may never recover. ;) I'm...

@objektwerks I checked and #2762 will improve the behaviour. Also by making some pull requests you can increase your rank rapidly. #### Old ranks > Available ranks are S+ (top...

> @francois-rozet Everyone has different development styles. Hence the multi-style ranking suggestion. :) I agree with @francois-rozet on this one 😅. Although everybody has a different development style, from experience...

@FayasNoushad is it okay to keep this open? We use 👍🏻 to judge which pull requests and issues to merge (see https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats/issues/1935). If this issue or the accompanying pull requests...