Richard van der Hoff
Richard van der Hoff
@clokep says: Hello! 👋 I believe that both MSC3666 and MSC3715 are ready for consideration by the SCT. They're both minor improvements that build on MSC2675.
@mscbot concern unclear why this is required
@mscbot resolve concern unclear why this is required
@mscbot resolve concern unclear why this is required
@mscbot resolve unclear why this is required
(to replace matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#2625)
> I assume you mean a separate MSC rather than an addition to this MSC? well no, I rather think it ought to be part of this one. See also...
thanks for the detailed review and helping to spot the edge-cases we forgot, @turt2live !
I don't think it's reasonable to keep this "experimental" code in synapse's mainline indefinitely; we either need to commit to speccing it properly, or to removing it. It's worth noting...
@turt2live given the provided links to client-side implementations, are you happy to waive your concerns? If not, could you be more specific about what you would want to see here?