Richard Werkman

To test this I cloned stryker fresh on another machine and ran stryker there. It worked! So indeed there seems to be something wrong with my local machine. I've tested...

After some further investigation (and asking others to try running stryker on stryker) these are my findings: - The issue only seems to occur on Windows 11 - @dupdob could...

In that case it could also be the dotnet version. I'm on the latest (7.0.401)

@danihengeveld Work for this issue is 90% done in my branch https://github.com/stryker-mutator/stryker-net/pull/2124. You could help me by fixing the merge conflicts and do last testing. But the implementation is basically...

@gentcod The option you are using won't work in this case. `ignore-methods` will only ignore the _invocations_ of those methods. Not the _declarations_. So the behaviour you're seeing is by...

Possibly related to #466

@candoumbe have you tried the suggestion to set the concurrency? `dotnet stryker -c 4` for example.

We might be able to reuse the coverlet collector https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet/blob/master/src/coverlet.collector/DataCollection/CoverletCoverageCollector.cs

@dupdob I don't think we need to use the coverage information to determine mutant coverage. We can keep that like it is. We just need to add coverage analysis to...

Yes we do have unit tests. But the issue here is that the span can get lost in a lot of places. It could go wrong in any of the...