rhodrin

> First thought: drop and burn release > > Second thought: provide a mini (mini) tutorial explaining how to transition from old to new Sounds good to me. We could...

> RIght what I had in mind. The it'll be trivial to extend it to allowing (ind, weight) pairs as coeffs for people who really want > custom stencils in...

From some `grep`'ing, would be a 'fairly' quick and easy change on our side - a few things need updating and a few tests fixing but wouldn't be too painful....

A fix for this issue is now present in https://github.com/devitocodes/devito/tree/fix_mpi_slicing_p3. It just needs some tidying and tests added (and then to join the current PR backlog!!). In the same branch...

I should note that this is now fixed in [fix_mpi_slicing_p2](https://github.com/devitocodes/devito/pull/1949). PR needs some tidying but is mostly ready.

As of 8/8/2019 issue 1 is no longer present in tests conducted thus far.

3. fixed by #1216 .

Depending on what exactly the problem is you're solving, there may be different ways you want to set this up, but if, for example, you want a simple periodic condition...

@aaron-shih Did you take a look at the c-code being produced (`print(op.ccode)`) - how does the algorithm being produced differ from what you want? If you're able to create a...

Note: Temporary fix in #1186.