Raphaël Hertzog

I did test the code and indeed it fixes only issue 5 so the PR should be reworded to not close #627. I did not find any other serious side-effect...

> Hmm, `act@cat #tag1` gives category `cat #tag1` and no tag. That would be a breaking change that some users might not appreciate. Yeah. That was something that I deliberately...

I added a supplementary change to ensure backwards compatibility with the double comma syntax, this is nice for external users (like GTG) who already adopted this change. And I got...

> Just to lift any ambiguity: this was already possible with v3.0: Yeah, but at the same time here was a test to ensure that without the double comma it...

> Why would a user expect to get the same thing with or without the documented barrier ? Because a barrier ought to be not needed when you don't want...

> I like simplifying the parser, though with the extra tags-inside-description feature, the parsing gets a bit more complicated again. I you don't do this, you lose some backward compatibility...

> is this autodiscovery something that you think is useful by itself and/or is it something that you would like to use? I'm running a patched hamster and I'm using...

I would love to see some discussion on https://github.com/projecthamster/hamster-shell-extension/issues/334 and see wether we prefer to revert 42d3c05 here or find some other solution elsewhere.

I can help for the Debian packaging (and for the upload to Debian, I'm a DD), in fact I created a package today without noticing that you already had some...

FWIW, I uploaded to Debian a package for the shell extension too: https://salsa.debian.org/projecthamster-team/gnome-shell-extension-hamster