rhatguy

I'll second everyone else's comments here. I'm not currently running facerecognition because recognize and memories were so easy to setup. I thought I'd finally found a web based method of...

The more I use recognize the less pleased I am with it. Its clustering people who are clearly not the same necessitating me to manually break those clusters apart into...


@wonx I tend to agree with your previous comment. Memories is already importing tons of metadata like GPS coordinates, timestamps, even camera make/model information, and storing it in the oc_memories...

Can you expand a bit on the lack of standardization? It seems like the implementation that Digikam, exiftool, PiGallery2, and others use is relatively a standard at this point at...

@wonx Wouldn't the best thing be to use the MetadataWorkingGroups defined structure? These structures seem to be fairly standardized and look similar between your example above and mine below (relevant...

@pulsejet looking at this a bit deeper and exploring the recognize tables in mysql (oc_recognize_face_detections and oc_recognize_face_clusters seem to be the most relevant), can you point me at any documentation...

The vector is used by recognize to cluster photos? Does memories use the vector at all? If not I'm not sure why we couldn't manually load the recognize tables and...

@pulsejet what is your ideal way to implement this? You mentioned that creating another table (and im guessing another sidebar entry for faces from photo metadata) being a lot of...

Not that my opinion matters a lot either way, but I would respectfully disagree. I view Recognize as a "creator" of metadata. It scans pictures and makes associations between faces...