Rudi Grinberg

Good point, doesn't that mean we can get rid of scheme from the request as well? @anuragsoni why did we add scheme?

@MisterDA do you want to take the honors of getting rid of it?

Indeed it's not worth it. I got rid of it here https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-cohttp/pull/1086

I was waiting to do another round of review after this PR went past the "draft" stage

> We could also have the format choice be made a part of t capability, but I am not sure this is worth the added complexity ? You could default...

Anyway I don't have a principled objection. I just think it would be a shame if you did the extra work to implement and nobody would end up using it....

I don't particularly care if we have more than one name, but I'm strongly against making breaking changes that offer no benefits to the user. So even if we introduce...

You can use a different build profile as a workaround. Changing the compiler flags for utop isn't great because it will mean that you will need to rebuild everything just...

Maybe this should go under `describe`/`show`? Don't think this command is going to be used enough to live at the top level tbh.

There are other commands under `$ dune describe` that are no less useful for debugging, shall we promote them all to the top level as well? The point of having...