rgaudin

Pretty sure we're doing similar stuff in other scrapers. I believe we use Path (PurePosixPath would be better) on the `path` or a parsed URL. Please take a look at...

> it is way clearer than `PurePosixPath` or `Path` which are not working on URLs There's a clue in the name that those are not the same thing 😉 Though,...

Indeed the method used to detect whether a stackoverflow domain uses highlighting or not doesn't work anymore. I'll look for an alternative but maybe it's easier and more future-proof to...

> @rgaudin Or create an automated test to secure it works fine still. Not quite adapted in this case I think. We're looking on online source for a clue informing...

Some important information for those who've been struggling with Service Worker and want some details: - Role of SW is to replace a Server Backend. In the context of WR's...

Found another scenario that could benefit from part of this solution. With libkiwix reading/parsing/serving custom HTTP headers for entries, it would be possible for a ZIM reader to return an...

No existing recipe would be affected because they were passing with the previous check so they don't have a redirect to an out-of-scope URL. I imagine that recipe/requests with such...

I don't think I can be more clear than the explanation above. Maybe reading the source code would help? https://github.com/openzim/zimit/blob/c98e4505a898434c9f36d4b8afe3fe9244879637/zimit.py#L470-L490

No idea and we can't really know: this information is just a warning in the logs. I don't think it would be much as users (at least ours) tend to...

Adding a third criteria should do the job