action-actionlint icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
action-actionlint copied to clipboard

run actionlint with reviewdog

Results 17 action-actionlint issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

When using artifact attestations described in https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/using-artifact-attestations-to-establish-provenance-for-builds the actionlint errors with an unknown permission: **Output** ``` unknown permission scope "attestations". all available permission scopes are "actions", "checks", "contents", "deployments", "discussions",...

We're using this action as a pull request check in a repository that sees a lot of autogenerated PRs touching many configuration files. If more than 300 files are changed...

When I defined `workdir` as an input paramter to this action I got error: `Unexpected input(s) 'workdir', valid inputs are ['entryPoint', 'args', 'github_token', 'tool_name', 'level', 'reporter', 'filter_mode', 'fail_on_error', 'reviewdog_flags', 'actionlint_flags']`....

This issue lists Renovate updates and detected dependencies. Read the [Dependency Dashboard](https://docs.renovatebot.com/key-concepts/dashboard/) docs to learn more.[View this repository on the Mend.io Web Portal](https://developer.mend.io/github/reviewdog/action-actionlint). ## Config Migration Needed - [ ]...

We have been using actionlint in our internal repositories at a project that we are working on. I was wondering if actionlint would be able to resolve conversations on it...

With the following ``` with: actionlint_flags: -ignore 'a pattern' ``` actionlint seems to run without producing any findings whatsoever but reports no errors. I noticed in the logs ``` "/home/runner/work/_temp/_runner_file_commands":"/github/file_commands"...

We are using runner labels and get errors like ``` [actionlint] reported by reviewdog 🐶 label "scripts" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "windows-2016", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "ubuntu-18.04",...

I use this action to lint written workflows and found `filtered finding` indication useful. Is there any way to make the linter fail, when there will be any filtered finding?

Here is some of the code from my Github workflow: ```yaml - name: Apply Env Provisioning run: | # shellcheck disable=SC2086 envsubst < ${{ inputs.provisioning-file-path }} > provisioning-replaced.yaml ``` and...

Update actionlint to [v1.7.2](https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/releases/tag/v1.7.2) Compare [v1.7.1...v1.7.2](https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/compare/v1.7.1...v1.7.2) This PR is auto generated by [depup workflow](https://github.com/reviewdog/action-actionlint/actions?query=workflow%3Adepup).

bump:minor