Andriy Redko

> Sure her it is [ref](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.10/mapping-source-field.html#:~:text=Think%20before%20disabling%20the%20_source%20field). Thanks @navneet1v but I don't see any mentions of `_recovery_source` there [1], am I missing something? (Citing that you commented It is not directly...

> But one thing I want to confirm here is, is there anything else required apart from docs before I can get a review on the PR. @navneet1v I think...

@jzonthemtn I haven't look into implementation yet (sorry about that), but it looks to me the plugin should not be part of the core but a separate repository (like most...

@sohami @sgup432 @kiranprakash154 it might be caused by https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/12941

It might but not in this case (see please description)

Closing in favour of https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/issues/14288

@saratvemulapalli thanks for the RFC, how beneficial is gRPC for extensions actually? I am not against it but I have doubts we have a compelling use case now for it:...

Thanks a lot @saratvemulapalli , I was a bit confused by gRPC mentions but @nknize clearly clarified that we are only talking about serialization mechanism (protobufs), and not the communication...

@Bukhtawar I don't recall there was any evaluation being done

The ones I have seen quite often in place of protobuf, if it could help, are: - Kryo (https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo) - Apache Avro (https://github.com/apache/avro) - Apache Thrift (https://github.com/apache/Thrift) - MessagePack (https://msgpack.org/index.html)...