pvmigrate
pvmigrate copied to clipboard
get code coverage in tests
Total Coverage: 73.30%
Coverage Report
Total Coverage: 73.30%
Coverage Report
Total Coverage: 73.37%
Coverage Report
Total Coverage: 73.37%
Coverage Report
Total Coverage: 73.37%
Coverage Report
We've made determinations in the past not to use test coverage as a metric. cc/ @marccampbell
That's fair. What I'd really like to have in this is "these are the lines you added, and this is which of those lines are covered" but that might take some actual work to implement.
Agreeing with @erquhart. I'd like to not include this. In the end, it's not important that every line of code have test coverage, it's important that workflows do. Unfortunately, mapping this to "lines of code" is that best we can do today, but that comes with downsides we'd like to avoid (at least for now).
I like the goal here (give more data to the reviewer about the quality of the change). But is there a way we can do it without reporting on "lines of code covered"?