Rene Pickhardt

this looks good to me but of course this is for @rustyrussell to decide. Did not expect that my issue would actually get a PR or any fix at all....

of course one can just use the `--blockdir` argument when calling the tool. eg: `$ ./bitcoin-iterate --output='%bN' --blockdir='~/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin/blocks/'`

since you currently are heavily bound to lnd I suggest to keep `lnd` in the name to avoid confusions. so maybe: * lnd controller * lnd routing node manager *...

Sorry for shilling my own stuff for the second time but there is a summer of bitcoin project working on this which may be relevant. I will link the relvant...

As discussed I have unfortunately nothing concrete that I can say. I would try discect the flow in a way that the expected information gain of the sent onions is...

may be relevant: https://github.com/renepickhardt/mpp-splitter/issues/13 I am currently considering to basically multiply the cost of an edge with a number that increases exponentially with the topological distance of the edge from...

sure that is a quickfix but that still does not make clear how one should request such a payment for a fixed amount. I mean you could argue now that...

as discussed before it is strange that in MKN all the lower order probabilities are made off continutation counts. That is a rather strange choice. In particular it is not...

As discussed on the phone right now my "fix" is to radical in a way that cannot have two continuation skips in the numerator. comming from N1+(*bab) looking at how...

as discussed before: In the GLM case I can understand that we have 0 probabilities (not in 80% of our cases) since we haved fixed positions and it could happen...