Remko Tronçon

I don't really understand the reasoning behind the complexity yet. As far as I can tell, this plugin doesn't do any transformations on the JSON, and just passes everything straight...

@jpaquim Thanks! Very nice to hear this work has inspired you! I don't know if other projects take this approach, but I must admit i'm not following everything that's going...

@jpaquim [here](https://wingolog.org/archives/2022/08/18/just-in-time-code-generation-within-webassembly) is a link that will probably interest you. It talks about some of the same techniques used in WAForth, and comes with Scheme examples.

I didn't experiment with a C implementation. I don't think there's a good technical reason to use WebAssembly directly, except perhaps direct control over the function table (the link above...

Hi @jacereda Where did you see the difference? Did you do your own measurements, or are you referring to the toy tests I once did? If the latter, I wouldn't...

Yeah, those benchmarks are outdated. In WebAssembly, you don't have any control over registers. As mentioned in the [Design document](https://github.com/remko/waforth/blob/master/doc/Design.md), subroutine threading is the only alternative in WebAssembly. Direct/indirect threading...

I believe that's more or less what happens today (not at the time of the benchmarks). For example, this is the implementation of the `DROP` word: (func $DROP (param $tos...

Hi @cdaringe, thanks for taking the time to respond. > It could be as simple as: As you indicated, although this could serve as an initial step of an amalgamated...

I just want to mention that upgrades like the one in #230 sound like they would be a lot less painful for both AmpersandJS maintainers and AmpersandJS users (again, I...

Any news on this? Is there a way to alias typescriptreact to typescript?