tim
tim
I don't know the answer to that question, to be honest. However, I am pretty sure that I have seen other honeypots than the ones I mentioned do this. Maybe...
@Eshaan-byte : Yes, sure! :) @Mystic-del12 : I honestly don't know. @Eshaan-byte commented first, so they get assigned. Sorry.
@Eshaan-byte are you still working on this? @IshaanXCoder let's finish #607 first.
I had a similar idea a year ago and I still agree that it might be better to just skip validation by default. However @mlodic objected this back then and...
> I suggest to keep things in Github as much as possible for easier tracking but sure, if you want to have a chat, I think it is better if...
Thanks for your work! I will check your method tomorrow.
Your method seems solid! Could you please try one more thing: Switch your code sections such that your proposed solution runs BEFORE the current implementation. Then try to reproduce your...
I reopened the issue until we come to a final conclusion regarding the validation.
Nice, thank you! I am in favor of omitting the validation or at least introduce a setting to do so. What do you think @mlodic ?
Would you like to get assigned to this issue @opbot-xd ?