Zoltán Reegn

yes on fork... This is too good of a project to be abandoned like this. But if you're seriously considering a fork, please make the https://github.com/jqmaintainers members public, I don't...

@ceresdarkmatter I think it's possible to replace jq with the fork and include it in homebrew/ubuntu/fedora/arch/etc., but first you need a convincing argument that this is not a hostile fork,...

I'm seeing that PR #416 had some architecture changes to introduce a backend, I think that work could be picked up again to make a PR (just the backend part,...

I think I'd be more comfortable with sealed-secrets spawning the process, as that model is already battle-proven in terraform, so one could use terraform as an inspiration for that plugin/provider...

I'm also having the same issue.

I would also highlight this part of https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes/#cgroup-drivers > A single cgroup manager will simplify the view of what resources are being allocated and will by default have a more...

@jjjms I have created a PR with the changes you have described. Now we just need to get that merged!

I also found that kubeadm now actively checks for the cgroup driver to be systemd: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/73837 They also had a discussion about it here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/1394

Another interesting issue that might block this change is this one: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/issues/5134#issuecomment-656799551 Systemd had some dbus issues that only got fixed in systemd 242. Apparently RedHat has backported that to...

@abeer91 could you please reopen this ticket? since #521 got reverted in #587 , this ticket should stay open until that change is applied again.