Richard Eckart de Castilho

If by extensions you mean e.g. the generated types - I think these should be released separately and with the same version numbers as the corresponding DKPro Core / cTAKES...

@zesch @aggarwalpiush WDYT? Type-system-specific accessors and Python classes generated from type systems should probably be kept together and have a release cycle mirroring the release cycle of the type system...

Annotations that do not have begin/end are called "feature structures" ;)

Can you provide a runnable Java project (preferably a Maven Project) which allows reproducing your problem?

It seems this case can happen when annotation classes are used before a CAS / type-system is initialized. Due to the initialization order, it can happen that the JCCI for...

There is no fix yet - I need to find time to investigate it further because changes in this PR do not yet resolve the problem. The alternative would be...

I don't know how this code is used, but usually having static flags somewhere like a `DO_NOT_DELETE_TEMP_FILES` is not a good idea. I'd still recommend allowing local control over this...

I have given my advice, but for me it's really up to you how you prefer it. So I'm +0 for all options :)

> Local control strategy with removal option, i.e. keep all .bin files by default unless -wipe-bin-files is specified, proposed by @reckart. Mind my comment was about the API of the...

Puh... I could easily disable PMD for PR builds and just keep it active for master builds. I know that some tools (I think checkstyle and/or findbugs as well) support...