Does column lineage have order (from tableA to tableB)? The order seems to be wrong when subquery-to-subquery

[codereason]

In my nested SQL query code it looks like this:

select T.* from ( select tmp.* from ( select RY.* from table RY) tmp ) T

When I'm trying to debug the code and watch the lineages it gets a result like this:

(Column: TMP.*, Column: T.*, Column: RY.*)

Looks like it has lineage from TMP -> T -> RY (all of them's fathers are SubQuery types), where RY is actually on the most inside and T.* on the most outside. Seems RY.*->tmp.*->T.* makes sense to me.

When I was looking up in other posts, it says in a parsed lineage tuple, "the last one is the downstream table/columns, while the rest are upstream(source) table/columns". ( # 元组中最后一个元素为下游表名与字段名，其他元素为上游表名与字段名) Link

Clearly this goes against what I expected. Am I missing some concepts here?

[reata]

This looks like a bug. Can you share the sqllineage version and dialect you're using? Also are you getting the lineage result from command line, or viewing it in UI?

[reata]

Close as no further response.