readthedocs.org
readthedocs.org copied to clipboard
The source code that powers readthedocs.org
I have assumed ownership of this project on PyPi: https://github.com/hMatoba/Piexif/issues/122#issuecomment-1241027599 and moved it to a new fork: https://github.com/JEFuller/Piexif/. Can I get https://piexif.readthedocs.io/ transferred to my rtd user `davetapley`? 🙏🏻
## Details * Read the Docs project URL: https://readthedocs.org/projects/xray/ * Build URL (if applicable): https://readthedocs.org/projects/xray/builds/18134887/ * Read the Docs username (if applicable): https://readthedocs.org/profiles/{your_rtd_username}/ ## Expected Result Pull Request preview to...
## Details * Build URL (if applicable): https://readthedocs.org/projects/aws-sdk-pandas/builds/18134030/ ## Expected Result Build the latest tagged commit ## Actual Result The webhook started the build but it built from the old...
Had to do some refactoring now that we are introducing more actions to logs, there are: - Add a json field (data) to the auditlog model, this is so we...
I currently manually download docs from readthedocs and run `doc2dash` manually, locally. This is annoying because I have to manually enter the version number, redirect URL, et. al.. However, the...
Preparing things for v3 https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/pull/9615. Code is the same, it was just moved. --- :books: Documentation previews :books: - User's documentation (`docs`): https://docs--9616.org.readthedocs.build/en/9616/ - Developer's documentation (`dev`): https://dev--9616.org.readthedocs.build/en/9616/
WIP implementation of https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/pull/9533. Going to split api.py file into modules first. --- :books: Documentation previews :books: - User's documentation (`docs`): https://docs--9615.org.readthedocs.build/en/9615/ - Developer's documentation (`dev`): https://dev--9615.org.readthedocs.build/en/9615/
The contributing documentation talks about applying the feature tag, but there's only a template for bug reports.
- At first I was thinking to add this validation outside the unresolver, but I think it makes sense to be in the unresolver. - This also has a fix...
Dependencies: all packages updated via pip-tools