bounties
bounties copied to clipboard
rchain
ONGOING: Manage Telegram growth, focus, support
Describe how the building and implementation of this task will benefit RChain:
The organic growth of the Telegram groups continues. Admins are keeping the conversation focused on the tech as opposed to the market. Lots of the same questions get asked and with the answers admins often send users on to Github, Jira, and the Dev site. A lot of Members onboard via Telegram. Admins steer users to join and provide support for the process.
Current groups https://t.me/rchain_coop https://t.me/rchain_official (announcement channel) https://t.me/rchain_africa (#592) https://t.me/rchain_cn https://t.me/rchain_fr https://t.me/rchain_nl https://t.me/rchain_ru (#596)
Estimated Budget of Task: $2480 Estimated Timeline Required to Complete the Task: the current month Measure of Completion: see Combot statistics for the larger groups
-- Legal Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.
This is the May activity for the RChain_Coop group: https://combot.org/chat/-1001123521235?start=01%2F05%2F2018&end=31%2F05%2F2018
We're testing the DaySandBox bot, which: "Removes forwarded and link-containing posts from new group users (joined less than [24] hours ago)." It's configurable.
The DaySandBox bot has been added to @rchain_coop with default settings.
Common commands: /daysandbox_get publog /daysandbox_set publog=yes /daysandbox_get safe_hours /daysandbox_set safe_hours=24
May activity for the RChain_Africa group: https://combot.org/chat/-1001196019499?start=01%2F05%2F2018&end=31%2F05%2F2018 Up to 39 members now.
@kitblake The telegram groups has made tremendous growth and it has provided both existing and new members with relevant information on how to grow the coop . RChain Africa group will continually intensify its efforts to involve more RAM
Yesterday we had somebody PMing users with spam, including @ddayan who reported it in the group. Then the spammer left and returned under a new name with @ddayan's avatar. So If you're dubious about a user, inspect the avatar. If the old avatar is obviously a different person, ban.
The @daysandbox_bot is proving really useful. If not already done, admins should consider installing it.
Some numbers at the end of the month: @rchain_coop 2624 members @rchain_africa 51 @rchain_china 242 @rchain_france 24 @rchain_nl 53 @rchain_ru 7 QQ group China: 893
@kitblake can you post a status update again (and lead a suggestion on budget & rewards distribution on this issue)?
Numbers at the end of the month: @rchain_coop 2698 members @rchain_africa 59 @rchain_china 244 @rchain_france 24 @rchain_nl 51 @rchain_ru 9 QQ group China: 908
Member growth is clearly slowing, not sure why. Summertime? Activity has been consistent with previous months but shows a small drop in July.
Accordingly I've dropped the budget a bit in my vote, to 2240, and I used combat statistics to distribute the rewards.
Yeah, July was mostly slow except for this past week where talks about marketing and the Validator discussions has spurred interest. August would be better I believe.
Hi @kitblake
Is this still ongoing? Are there any updates? Do we need to vote on this for the month of August?
If so please place the ONGOING: tag to the front of the project.
@AyAyRon-P Yes, yes, yes, and done (added the missing ONGOING to the title). And thanks.
Numbers at the end of the month: @rchain_coop 2828 members @rchain_africa 69 @rchain_china 262 @rchain_france 24 @rchain_nl 54 @rchain_ru 8 QQ group China: 947
Rising less rapidly, but steadily. In the last days activity has been ratcheting up with the Validator sale and RCon3 approaching. Making the budget a bit more than last month, 2320.
@Ojimadu gets the crown again (but he'll be offline for the next weeks, so other admins need to pick up the slack).
@dckc @kitblake @patrickM727 @ddayan @ysgjay @pmoorman
From the meeting notes of the last impromptu TAC meeting, I see that there is a suggestion about not having to pay for "monitoring social media". I wasn't at the meeting so am airing my opinion here (as I have also done on the document).
I am not of the opinion that we shouldn't reward admin and management of social channels. There's a lot more into managing these channels than "just monitoring and deleting spam messages". RChain has so many moving part and keeping up with different chat channels, reading documents, watching videos and generally trying to keep up with the community takes significant time and dedication that's where much of the overhead comes from.
Also, there's another issue of responding to questions, engaging with the community members and managing general perception this is another aspect on its own. In crypto Telegram, reddit, Twitter and sometimes bitcointalk.org are channels that the crypto-community are very active on and they need to be actively managed as activities on these channels generally inform the perception outsiders of our community. At the last debrief (debrief 97) it was clearly pointed out that our social media outreach is not meeting up and am quite surprised that at this point we're deciding to leave these channels to only volunteers.
I think @kitblake is in the best position to answer this, since he had the most outspoken opinion on it (that is: everyone else just went along with what he suggested).
To me, what you're saying makes perfect sense. I think Kit's suggested that most volunteer management would get done anyway, independent of whether it's paid or not.
But really, it's best to discuss with Kit about it.
I don't see anyone disgreeing with you that the monitoring should be done, @ojimadu.
But I don't see anything in your argument to counter the notion that we can get it done on a volunteer basis.
@dckc, I believe it can get it done on a volunteer basis but IMO, that's somewhat like saying, since RChain is open source we should just have volunteers build it out and not pay anyone for it. Rewarding people for their time and effort whether volunteering or not gives a sense of responsibility and motivation and it also affect the amount of time people are willing to put into a given task, the scale of preference changes and this would reduce the overall effectiveness and this isn't needed especially when now. Also, it norm in most Crypto communities to have a mix volunteer and paid admin but having everything up for 'volunteering' is a risk that's not worth taking.
FWIW, I've been helping out on this too and I have been the most active admin on Telegram and I am not of the opinion of leaving it as "volunteer only".
OK, that's a coherent argument in favor of setting up budget norms for Social media going forward. I'll stay tuned to see how the negotiation with Marketing goes.
Meanwhile, @kitblake , the $2480 budget was supported in May, June, July, and August, which would seem to set a fairly strong expectation about September. I trust you'll work that out.
@dckc We're working on the sept rewards. It wasn't my intention to 'stiff' the diligent admins.
@Ojimadu I'm wearing two hats on this one. I completely agree with you, about the need in general and the value of (especially your) engagement.
But my manager persona says we can do it cheaper. Maybe we don't have to pay at all because, if you don't engage, other people may step up. For free.
If I'm proven wrong I'll actually be happy about it. Then we'll need to marshall some budget. But we need proof.