bounties
bounties copied to clipboard
rchain
F>Encourage Gitcoin funding of issues by other members
I'd like to propose we start encouraging the use of Gitcoin to let members fund issues that they believe haven't been funded enough or haven't been funded at all by the monthly budgeting spreadsheet. In the future I'd even like to see Gitcoin or Fundrequest be used by the COOP to fund issues.
Hi Lee,
You can add, fund any issue that you think is useful for RChain in the spreadsheet Pub Member Budget Allocation-Spending https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uxuxx8YN17KCIWcH1cUoGuSm2hAnIya2iAc6wxoaq1o/edit#gid=950224463 . And any participant can influence the rewards of each participant. Each month the participants receive their reward after sending in a prepared invoice.
Gitcoin is sweet, but issues can only be funded with ETH. How about RHOC?
-- Cheers, HJ
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Lee Carter [email protected] wrote:
I'd like to propose we start encouraging the use of Gitcoin https://gitcoin.co/ to let members fund issues that they believe haven't been funded enough or haven't been funded at all by the monthly budgeting spreadsheet. In the future I'd even like to see Gitcoin or Fundrequest be used by the COOP to fund issues.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/Members/issues/233, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB0x91OuqRYZL7T693y-WIr8cEVWzPeZks5tLOYPgaJpZM4RgM4- .
@lapin7 Gitcoin can use any ERC20 token. You can use RHOC, ZRX, whatever you want. When Rchain mainnet is launched then we would need to biuld our own but for now RHOC is accepted.
Oh that's good news. Maybe it's a good idea to use it somehow. Any proposals?
It can be a good idea, but what will become of RChain Github page if we adopt Gitcoin? Can the RChain GIthub page be integrated with Gitcoin?
While gitcoin is a nice idea, it does not fits into the way our current budgeting and allocation works as it centralizes the budgeting process but it would be a great way to get additonal funds from members on issues that is being worked on or to specifically tip a collaborator.
I agree with that. I don’t think adopting Gitcoin for funding every issue will work. However I think it can be a good way for members to fund issues they think should get more love than the current allocation. In order to do so it would need more adoption by current members (mainly having folks install the chrome extension).
-Lee
On Jan 17, 2018, at 3:24 PM, Ojimadu [email protected] wrote:
While gitcoin is a nice idea, it does not fits into the way our current budgeting and allocation works as it centralizes the budgeting process but it would be a great way to get additonal funds from members on issues that is being worked on or to specifically tip a collaborator.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
This is done to my satisfaction; some encouragement happened.
Feel free to re-open it if there's more to do.
discussion with @PatrickM727 , @deannald , @ddayan ...
@JoshOrndorff to follow up with Tim, Medha, ...
5.5k in slack Metamask uses it Tim B. knows Chris, a founder in gitcoin
I can confirm it does accept ERC20
“Feature Alert: Paying in ERC20 Tokens is 10x Easier!” @owocki https://medium.com/gitcoin/feature-alert-paying-in-erc20-tokens-is-10x-easier-30fabf74a418
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018, 2:33 PM Joshy Orndorff [email protected] wrote:
I was thinking gitcoin used any erc 20 token. Can we confirm that?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/233#issuecomment-425527298, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AImfBGoFrJ1YkdyhY4iPD0p1xuriNPR_ks5ufmtcgaJpZM4RgM4- .
Just to test this out, I posted a bounty on one of my personal projects, got excellent results overnight (granted it was a fairly basic bounty) and paid in RHOC.
https://gitcoin.co/issue/JoshOrndorff/BitStory/1/1298
Let's make this happen.
Is it easy to point us to that transaction?
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018, 5:46 PM Joshy Orndorff [email protected] wrote:
Just to test this out, I posted a bounty on one of my personal projects, got excellent results overnight (granted it was a fairly basic bounty) and paid in RHOC.
Let's make this happen.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/233#issuecomment-425680367, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNykQ-ufAjy_06loheEgWYBeHtVbyqks5uf_hJgaJpZM4RgM4- .
The gitcoin link: https://gitcoin.co/issue/JoshOrndorff/BitStory/1/1298 The original issue: https://github.com/JoshOrndorff/BitStory/issues/1
That particular bounty has nothing to do with the coop. I'm just saying gitcoin has good ux, is easy to learn, allows rhoc, and is onchain. I lived it.
Right... my pronouns were ambiguous. I meant:
Now that I have seen a lived example, how does this issue 233 relate to financial participation in the coop?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 11:25 PM Joshy Orndorff [email protected] wrote:
That particular bounty has nothing to do with the coop. I'm just saying gitcoin has good ux, is easy to learn, allows rhoc, and is onchain. I lived it.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/233#issuecomment-425786083, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNyr5PimDHzMNZ28KmjVXW9sQe97KXks5ugZk7gaJpZM4RgM4- .
-- Dan Connolly http://www.madmode.com/
I'm not sure I'm understanding the question, @dckc .
My hope is that we can use gitcoin for bounties that have traditionally happened here in this repo at least until we have a system that runs on RChain. It's an interesting system that "just works" and immediately solves our UX issues. Now that we're requiring sponsors for bounties, it would be the sponsors' responsibility to officially fund the issue on gitcoin (maybe with Kate's help) signalling official sponsorship (show me the money).
As a way of transition, this repo and its issue queue could be used for community members to propose bounties of their own, and when sponsors come along, they then post funds to gitcoin.
In the current bounty system, only coop members are eligible for rewards. This has something do do with the regulatory status of RHOC and stuff... I'm a bit fuzzy on the details. But... would we require those who participate via gitcoin to join the coop? If not, that would be a change to the bounty system that's "above my pay grade"; I'd have to check with the board, or at least the executive committee.
I have no problem telling them that they're required to join to coop.
This bounty is complete when
is comited and the bounty hunter joins the coop.
Enforcement may be tough, but I wonder whether it's necessary. If nothing else individuals ca nsponsor bounties with gitcoin.
I'm hereby proposing that bounties posted in our bounty system be cross-posted in gitcoin. Gitcoin is specifically designed to link with github issues, so there is no risk of parallel work streams developing. All work happens here on github. We can make it clear that the bounty is not payable until the bounty hunter joins the coop.
If nothing else this will give us visibility to the ethereum community and other projects using gitcoin. If we're lucky it will also bring new developers to the platform.
@dckc @PatrickM727 @deannald Anyone opposed? Can silence be consent?
Seems worth a try. Maybe not for all our bounties, but a few concrete examples to work out any kinks.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 9:44 PM Joshy Orndorff [email protected] wrote:
I'm hereby proposing that bounties posted in our bounty system be cross-posted in gitcoin. Gitcoin is specifically designed to link with github issues, so there is no risk of parallel work streams developing. All work happens here on github. We can make it clear that the bounty is not payable until the bounty hunter joins the coop.
If nothing else this will give us visibility to the ethereum community and other projects using gitcoin. If we're lucky it will also bring new developers to the platform.
@dckc https://github.com/dckc @PatrickM727 https://github.com/PatrickM727 @deannald https://github.com/deannald Anyone opposed? Anyone think we should ask a lawyer first? Can silence be consent?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/233#issuecomment-427229940, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNyumYBBVAPQTCFLpOa38yREw0ap-2ks5uhsemgaJpZM4RgM4- .
Hi from Gitcoin.. Thanks for the tag @kdvalentine
I have no problem telling them that they're required to join to coop.
This is fine with us too.
Seems worth a try
Give it a shot and let me know if any questions / feedback.
